Pixels
Make your home in a sprawling pixel-art world: farm crops, raise animals, gather resources, and level up skills alongside thousands of other players. Pixels runs...
How Token Health Scoring Works
The Health Score is our quick read on how solid a token looks, from 0 to 100. We build it from public on-chain data, holder records, and price history, and we refresh it every day. A higher score means the token looks healthier on the things we measure. It is our own estimate, not a guarantee and not financial advice.
Overall Score
We rate a token on four things and weight each by how much it tells you about staying power. Community and liquidity carry the most weight, because a token lives on real holders and real trading depth.
Community × 30%+Liquidity × 30%+Project × 25%+Interest × 15%
Community
30%
Who holds the token, and whether the crowd is growing. A token scores well here when many wallets hold it, when no small group owns most of the supply, and when the holder count is climbing. When ten wallets own nearly everything, the score drops, since those few can move the price or sell out at will. Brand-new tokens get a small floor so a thin early crowd does not sink them on day one.
40%
Holder countHow many wallets hold it. More holders, higher score.
35%
ConcentrationHow much the top ten wallets own. The less they hold, the better.
25%
GrowthWhether the holder count rose or fell over the past week.
Liquidity
30%
Liquidity is how easily you can buy or sell without shoving the price around. We look at how much money sits in the token’s trading pools and whether the trading activity fits that depth. Deep pools with steady, proportionate volume score well. Near-empty pools, or volume that towers over a shallow pool, score poorly.
50%
Pool depthHow much money is locked in the trading pools. Deeper is safer to trade.
30%
Volume vs depthWhether daily trading sits in a healthy range for the pool size. Too little looks dead, too much looks staged.
20%
ValuationThe token’s value if every coin were in circulation, measured against its real pool depth. A huge valuation on a shallow pool gets marked down.
Project
25%
The project behind the token: how long it has been around and how openly it shows up. Older projects with a real website and active social channels score higher. We fold a safety check in here too. If the token is flagged as a honeypot, a trap you can buy into but cannot sell out of, this score goes to zero.
35%
AgeHow long the token has existed. A longer track record scores higher.
45%
PresenceWhether it has a website, an active X/Twitter, Telegram or Discord, and a real description.
20%
SafetyA clean honeypot check scores full marks, a flagged honeypot scores zero, unknown sits in the middle.
Interest
15%
Whether people are paying attention right now. Rising trading volume and real price movement lift this score. A token that has gone quiet and flat sits low. We use the size of a price move, not its direction, since a sharp drop still means people are active.
40%
Volume trendThis week’s trading against the past month. Rising volume scores higher.
35%
Price movementHow much the price moved over a week, up or down.
25%
Market sizeBigger, more established tokens score higher here.
When scores update
We recalculate every token’s score once a day from the latest holder snapshots, prices, and project details. A token that has gone quiet, with no real trading for two weeks, stops getting a score, since there is nothing current to measure. Tokens with too little data to judge fairly show no score rather than a misleading one.
