Games for a Living
GFAL Minimal indicatorsUSD$0.000801
-0.96%
24h
Price History
USD chart
About
Games for a Living
GFAL ranks #70 of 581 in JRPG's gaming-token index by market cap. Over the past 30 days GFAL has lost 22.1%.
JRPG's Token Health model scores it 54/100, strongest on community, weakest on market interest. The Wash Trading Detector shows minimal indicators (15/100 signal score): volume climbs while the price stays flat. The top 10 wallets control 69.9% of supply. Holder count held flat over the past week.
Converter
Market Info
- Gaming Index Rank
- #70
- Market Cap
- $8M
- Fully Diluted Valuation
- $8M
- 24h Trading Volume
- $742
- Market Cap 24h
- -0.96%
Tokenomics
Supply Breakdown
5.3B Circulating 10B Total 10B Max
Circulating 52.5%
Non-circulating 47.5%
Historical Price
- 24h Price Range
- $0.000801 – $0.000809
- 1-Year Range
- $0.000411 – $0.008066
- All-Time High
- $0.0487 -98.36%Dec 3, 2023
- All-Time Low
- $0.000395 +102.97%Apr 14, 2026
Market Cap Analysis
- First Tracked
- Mar 14, 2023
- ATH Market Cap
- $74.4M
- 1Y Mcap Range
- $2.2M – $42.4M
- YTD Performance
- -43.74%
Price Performance
- 7 Days
- -1.08%
- 14 Days
- -5.88%
- 30 Days
- -22.05%
- 60 Days
- -39.30%
- 200 Days
- -83.25%
- 1 Year
- -82.05%
Holder History
19,191
holders
7d: −5 (-0.03%) 30d: −923 (-4.59%)
Distribution
- Top 10: 69.9222%
- #11–30: 12.6361%
- #31–50: 3.3213%
- Rest: 14.1204%
53.9 / 100
overall score
Weighted average: Community 30%, Liquidity 30%, Project 25%, Interest 15%
-
Community Holder count, ownership concentration, and holder growth rate 62.9
-
Liquidity Pool reserves, volume-to-liquidity ratio, and valuation 58.1
-
Project Token age, social presence, and safety signals 48.3
-
Interest Volume trends, price momentum, and market cap 36.9
15.02 / 100
risk score
· medium confidence
-
Volume / Market Cap Ratio High trading volume relative to market cap can indicate artificial volume inflation 0
-
Price-Volume Divergence High volume with minimal price movement suggests wash trading 50
-
Volume Spike Sudden volume spikes without price movement may be artificially generated 0
-
Peer Comparison Volume patterns compared against tokens in similar categories 0
30-day trend
Frequently asked about Games for a Living
Is Games for a Living in JRPG's gaming-token index?
Yes. Games for a Living is one of 581 constituents in JRPG's gaming-token index, ranked #70 by market cap. The index covers every eligible Web3 gaming token and reranks daily, so a token's position shifts as the market moves.
How healthy is Games for a Living?
JRPG's Token Health model scores Games for a Living 54 out of 100. Games for a Living scores strongest on community and weakest on market interest, the high and low among the model's four on-chain signals. The rating updates daily from live on-chain data.
Does Games for a Living show signs of wash trading?
JRPG's Wash Trading Detector shows minimal indicators for Games for a Living, a 15/100 signal score. The clearest sign: volume climbs while the price stays flat. The detector reads reported trading for signs of manufactured volume, so a lower score points to organic activity and a higher one warrants caution.
How concentrated is Games for a Living's ownership?
The top 10 wallets hold 69.9% of Games for a Living's circulating supply, a concentrated holder base. Holder count held flat over the past week. When a handful of wallets hold most of the supply, they can move the price by trading, while a wider spread of holders softens that swing.
How has Games for a Living performed recently?
Over the past 30 days Games for a Living has lost 22.1%. A 30-day window captures the token's recent trend while filtering out single-day noise.
What is Games for a Living's market cap?
Games for a Living's market cap is about $8M, on a circulating supply near 5.3B GFAL. That figure is the live price times circulating supply, so it captures Games for a Living's overall size better than the per-token price does, the fairer basis for weighing it against other gaming tokens.